... | answering the question "How do I handle being out of control?" | |
<quote>
WHEN YOU'RE OUT OF CONTROL, BE OUT OF CONTROL, OR YOU CAN CREATE BEING OUT OF CONTROL, OR YOU CAN RE-CREATE BEING OUT OF CONTROL. <unquote> |
1) |
BE OUT OF CONTROL
For starters, look: we're always out of control. Really! The notion that we are or even ever could be 100% in control, is merely a convenient if not naïve illusion. And if you take exception with what I just said, consider that we're all hurtling around the sun at 67,000 miles per hour. Seriously now: exactly how much control do you have over that? Insisting that you have control over it, poses a credibility problem in and of itself. Stop pretending you're 100% in control ie stop pretending you're in control period. Being out of control when you're out of control ie surrendering to being out of control when you're out of control, is to be real, is to choose what is, is to choose what's so, is to be appropriate, is to be authentic. So (one): when you BE out of control when you're out of control, you're in control (that's one delicious Zen paradox). |
2) |
CREATE BEING OUT OF CONTROL
There's his second option too, one which may land as an oxymoron at first: when you're out of control, and while you're out of control you create being out of control, you restore ownership of the experience of being out of control. You're now its source ie you're the creator of the experience of being out of control, therefore you're in control. Sit with this in your lap like a hot brick: to create being out of control when you're out of control is to restore being in control. So (two): when you CREATE being out of control when you're out of control, you become the creator of the experience of being out of control. When you're the creator of your experience of being out of control, you're in control (which in and of itself has another profound Zen poignancy). |
3) |
RE-CREATE BEING OUT OF CONTROL
Then there's also his third option, which is: when you're out of control, and while you're out of control, you re-create the experience of being out of control, the experience of being out of control disappears, leaving you in control again. Look: please don't blindly accept that just because I said it. First try it on for size. The underlying principle here is: no two identical things can occupy the same space at the same time. And if you make them occupy the same space at the same time, they disappear (notice this anomaly is only available in the domain of experience, not as a concept). So (three): when you RE-CREATE being out of control when you're out of control, the experience of being out of control disappears. That's as classic "Werner" as it'll ever get for us: re-created experience ie experienced experience disappears (in Transformation 101 that's almost axiomatic, yes?). When you re-create your experience of being out of control, it disappears and you're in control again. It's more than that actually: it's also that the act of re-creating your experience of being out of control is, in and of itself, an act of being in control / restoring control again. |
1) | "When you're treated unfairly, be treated unfairly, or you can create being treated unfairly, or you can re-create being treated unfairly", or |
2) | "When you're disappointed, be disappointed, or you can create being disappointed, or you can re-create being disappointed", or |
3) | "When you're insulted, be insulted, or you can create being insulted, or you can re-create being insulted" etc etc. |
Communication Promise | E-Mail | Home |
© Laurence Platt - 2022 through 2024 | Permission |