can be described in many different
of describing the
ie the from and the to of it, if you will, is
to distinguish between its before, being powerless over the
in life (and having reasons, explanations, and justifications for being
powerless over the
in life), and its after, having
over them (and having a
and a say over them). There are arguably
other more esoteric descriptions of
and even other more intelligent descriptions. But the
bottom line is if whatever's described as
available, that probably ain't it, and not
is not for the fainthearted. It's not so-called
It won't help you. And it's not designed to. Look: the
doesn't need any help.
It's OK the way it is.
So are you.
you are - although sometimes you may say it doesn't look like it. You
don't have to do anything to be OK. You're OK
you are (you're also, by
you aren't - which is a deeper cut at this assertion). So
when you're in a
the ideas which become available ie the ideas which come forth, don't
(and shouldn't) pertain to helping you or to making you OK. Rather they
to what's important, to what matters to people. Furthermore they
on what's important ie on what matters.
If you say describing
isn't necessary ie if you say it's a given ie it's an obvious,
then be careful: you may just be preaching to the choir. In
out there (if you will), there's a prevalent
the work of transformation
as lumped into the
body of knowledge. Now look: there's nothing wrong with the
body of knowledge. If anything, it's one of the most enduring and
expansive bodies of knowledge in the history of
Almost instinctively, we know there's something else
around this, is: help is needed to
body of knowledge thrives on this.