"If you don't take it out into
the world,
you didn't
get
it in the first place."
...
I am indebted to Anita Lynn Erhard and to Deborah Erhard who inspired
this conversation.
Whichever facet of the national spectrum you align with now (and
arguably more than at many other
times
in history, today's national spectrum is
truly
multi-faceted), whichever religious persuasion or ethnic roots you're
invested in, whichever class or
financial
bracket you occupy, whichever country you're a resident of and whatever
its
intentions
for
our planet
are (or aren't), in other
words
from whatever
point of view
you look, we all actually have something in
common:
it's we could each equally aver
the world
today is seriously out of
whack
with
what's possible.
You're a hawk?
The world
is seriously out of
whack
with
what's possible.
You're a dove?
The world
is seriously out of
whack
with
what's possible.
How poignant is that! Of all the unlikely things there are
on which we could all possibly agree, it's
got
to be that one.
Here's the fracture in
world-weary
dissatisfaction: it asks
whypeople
don't
get
more done for the benefit of
the world.
A more astute
question
is: is it
possible
to
getanything done which will ever make any
difference at all, if whatever we do is predicated on us not knowing
who we really are?
Can anyone who doesn't know
who they really are,
ever
get
anything done that will make a lasting difference in
the world?
No it's much more than that. It's can anyone who doesn't know
who they really are
ever be satisfied by anything anyone else does? Plus ça
change, plus c'est la même chose. Wait! Isn't that what's
going on most of the
timeeverywhere? Uh oh!