Conversations For Transformation: Essays Inspired By The Ideas Of Werner Erhard

Conversations For Transformation

Essays By Laurence Platt

Inspired By The Ideas Of Werner Erhard

And More


GoFundMe

The Bottom Line:

What All This Is Not

Oxnard, California, USA

October 27, 2023



"What is out there for you is not what is out there - that is, what is 'out there for you' is not the so-called 'objective reality'. While we can confidently assume that there is an objective reality out there, that is not the reality that shows up for you. What shows up for you is a 'reality' generated by your brain. Put in another way, while we assume that what we perceive is the reality that is actually out there, in fact every shred of what shows up for you as reality is being wholly generated by your brain."
... 
"It's mine, all mine!"
... 
This essay, The Bottom Line: What All This Is Not, is the companion piece to What's Out There And What's Out There.




When it first landed for me, it was a stunning realization. It's a stunning realization for anyone for whom it lands I suppose. And man! It certainly was for me. What I got was: how people are  ie the way I say they are? I make it up. When I say "So-and-so is arrogant" for example, when I say "So-and-so is demanding", when I say "So-and-so is whatever", I make it up. People are arrogant or demanding or whatever, only inasmuch as I make up that they're that way. It's a distinction I only alit on much later in my life. Prior to that, there never was an "I make up that they're that way.". No, they are  that way.

Here's some clarification of what I mean by I "make it up". I don't mean I lie. I don't mean I imagine. I don't mean I conjecture. I mean that it's my own interpretation, my opinion, my casting that people are some particular way, and I haven't owned it's my interpretation, opinion, casting that they're that way  - so it seems to me that they are  that way. Somewhere along the line, the "I make it up" part of the equation got lost. "I make up that they are that way" was superseded by "They're that way" (no question), something I never discovered let alone realized I was doing. Life was s'posed  to be that way.

OK, what about the movies? Some are  entertaining? or "I make up that some are entertaining."? Music. That's a great song? or "I make up that it's a great song."? Books. It's a well-written book? or "I make up that it's a well-written book."? Weather. It's a beautiful day? or "I make up that it's a beautiful day."? Now to be clear about this, we don't talk that way. We don't preface everything we say with "I make up that ...". But this isn't about the way we say it. This is about getting the distinction in the first place. And the distinction "I make up that ..." could be rephrased as "That (ie whatever that  is) is in fact wholly generated by your brain.". Wholly generated by your brain?  And I ask you: if you're on to this distinction and starting to let it in, then how could it not be?

So now the question has become: exactly how much  of this do I make up? Do I make up just a bit of it? Do I make up some  of it? Do I make up a lot of it? Do I make up all  of it? Do I (and: what if I) make up the whole world?  I mean, do I (and: is it that maybe I) make up the whole god-damned thing?  What if there's no "the whole world" except the whole world that I make up?  What if there's no "the whole world" except the whole world generated by my brain?  Oh ... my ... God!  Look: no matter which way you cut it, the question is confronting. Really. It's daunting. If there's no "the whole world" out there except the whole world generated by my brain, then that "the whole world" can't be the so-called objective reality  I've always considered "the whole world" to be. And while I'm pretty certain that there is a "the whole world" out there which is that objective reality, I'll bet good money that's not the "the whole world" that shows up for you, and neither is it the "the whole world" to which you have access. "The whole world" that shows up for you, the one to which you have access, is wholly generated by your brain. And look: again, if you're on to this distinction and starting to let it in, then how could it not be?

So if it's indeed a given that there's no "the whole world" out there except the whole world generated by my brain, then what's my experience of where that puts me? It puts me present to everything. It puts me at cause  of everything. It makes me the source  of everything. Be careful: if you take what I just asserted as an argument or as a debate, it won't work. It doesn't occur in that domain. Instead try it on for size. Cloak yourself in it like an experience.

The bottom line is all of this may not be the so-called objective reality you've always considered "the whole world" to be. It may all be wholly generated by your brain. And yes, that is confronting. It's daunting. And it's a game-changer. Don't do anything with it now. Just sit with it in your lap, like a hot brick.



Communication Promise E-Mail | Home

© Laurence Platt - 2023, 2024 Permission