In the ordinary course of events, in a world which does
business as
usual
most of if not all of the time, it's hidden from who you are, from
who you're being. You're unaware of it. It's the who you're
being which you don't know. And it's not merely that you
don't know this who you're being. It's worse than that. It's
that you don't know that you don't know this who you're
being.
This who you're being isn't located in what
you know. Rather, it's located in how you've strung
together what you know. It's not what you know. It's how you
hold everything you know - and you don't know
how you hold everything you know, and you don't know that you don't
know how you hold everything you know.
It's your epistemology: not what you know,
but rather how you hold everything you know. It's a
slippery
distinction at best, an inconceivable one at worst.
noun
the part of philosophy that is about the study of how we know things
<unquote>
Notice how
slippery
even the dictionary definition of epistemology is. Notice
the dictionary definition includes the non-specific, vague terms
"part", "philosophy", "about", "study",
followed by "how we know things".
I'd go for this
slippery
dictionary definition a little more if we could exchange "how we
know things" with "how we hold the things we
know".
That feeling you always have? That thing
you've got going on in the background (which you don't know that you
don't know you've got going on in the background) which
jabs you and tells you
"Something's wrong!
Something's wrong!"?
The power of that thing, the power of that
"something's wrong"
doesn't come from anything you
know. The power of that
"something's wrong"
comes from the prejudice of
epistemology ie
"something's wrong"
is inherent in, is embedded in the way you've organized
everything you know.
Processes in
Werner's work
of
transformation
are designed to give you a sense of what an "originating
incident" is. Originating incidents are
incidents which occurred in the past, around and during which you made
decisions which shaped your epistemology and therefore
shaped your view of life subconsciously ever since.
It's always there. Even though hidden, even though forgotten, it's
always shaping, always bending, always molding, always skewing your
life. Forgetting it's there is what Werner distinguishes as not
what you know but rather what shapes what
you know and therefore what shapes the way you think. It's as
unique as your fingerprint, as specific as the pattern in your iris, as
personal as the configuration of the taste buds on your tongue. Yet you
just can't see it. You've forgotten it's there.
You could define transforming your life as being
synonymous with becoming senior to your particular
epistemology.