"I hold this to be the highest task of a bond between two
people:
that each should
stand
guard over the solitude of the other."
... Rainer Maria Rilke
This essay,
Relationships:
They Start, They End,
is the fifth in the open second group of
Experiences Of A Friend
(click
here
for the complete first group of thirty five
Experiences Of A Friend):
I wanted to
know
(no, I had to
know):
did
my friendreallysay
it? or did he not
say
it? So I
asked
him (the obvious thing to do). I told him what I'd
heard
that he'd allegedlysaid,
then I
asked
him
pointedly"Did you
say
that? or did you not
say
it?". He paused,
looking.
After a
moment
or two of silence, he replied
"Laurence,
I don't recall
saying
it ... but it does sound like something I would
say.".
Yes it does. We both agreed.
This isn't rocket science. It's
true:
relationships
do start, and they do end - even though when I'm mired in struggling to
make a
relationship
that's not
workingwork,
it's elusive to
see
in the
moment
that it
really
is that
simple.
Getting it,
and allowing it to be, I exhaled a long, satisfied, sigh of delighted
surprise and total relief.
Look:
the sunrise on the horizon, a spring tide on a
beach:
they start, they end. And you can't interfere with those processes, and
you can't impact their outcomes. More than that, even attempting to
interfere with those processes will inevitably and only result in
frustration. What you can do with them (and what may be
all you can do with them) is allow them to unfold, and
enjoy your
experience
of them.
Now,
if you
said
"But hold on just a
moment,
Laurence:
the sunrise and a spring tide are
mechanical
automatic processes!!!",
then I'd
say
"Yes they are. And do you
say
human beings in
relationshipsaren'tmechanical automatic
processes???
Really?".
Listen:
I want you to
get
this: secondarily I'm suggesting
"relationships:
they start, they end" implies they're delineated by, measured by,
book-ended
by their start and their end
times.
In this case, both (they have a) "start" and (they have an) "end" are
nouns. That much is trivial and obvious. For
now,
don't go there. Primarily I'm suggesting
"relationships:
they start, they end" implies an
observable
process in motion, exactly similar in its compelling
automaticity
to the sunrise and a spring tide. In this case, both "start" and "end"
are verbs - and all events seamlessly in between are
compelling,
automatic
verbs as well. It's all one contiguous process.