We've inherited (if you will)
language.
And the
language
we've inherited is
language
as a
tool
with which to talk about things,
language
as a
tool
with which to describe things etc. What we didn't inherit
is
language
with which to
cause
things,
language
with which to generate things - in other
words,
what we didn't inherit is
languageas
transformation.
What we've inherited is
language
as "talking about". What we've inherited is
language
as narration. What we've inherited is
language
as description.
I assert the
language
we've inherited is dichotomous. When I refer to dichotomous
language,
I mean
language
which exists in a dichotomy ie
language
which exists in a schism. Here's what I mean by
language
which exists in a schism:
Transformation
as
language
ie
transformation
as a
conversation,
starts off as an inquiry, as a personal inquiry, as a private inquiry,
as an intimate
conversation,
as an individualconversation.
By this personal, private inquiry ie by this intimate, individual
conversation,
I'm really referring to the
conversation
between an individual and himself or between an individual
and herself.